Comments by jacekw - Honouree

jacekw

about 2 years ago

For ranked - just don't submit battle on both ends (no contest) For brawls - make sure you don't play accounts in the same frays For tournam

1

0

0.020

about 2 years ago

3

0

0.095

about 2 years ago

Great stuff, thanks! Btw, I think there is something wrong here (win rate column): !image.png(

0

0

0.000

over 2 years ago

There will be leaderboard in champion league (and only there) anyway. 5000 rating is cap for reward calculation. But players will be able to

0

0

0.000

over 2 years ago

!image.png( There

2

0

0.012

over 2 years ago

500 battles played, 70% win rate = 350 wins = 3800 + 350 20 - 150 20 = 7800 200 battles played, 95% win rate = 190 wins = 3800 + 190 20 -

3

0

0.127

over 2 years ago

Flat system with +20/-20 would cause more ties, especially on the leaderboard. Imagine 50 players being 1, each of them having top prize.

0

0

0.000

almost 3 years ago

I would prefer to vote 1 issue at a time because there are so many aspects here that it is difficult to vote less prizes for GF tournament

2

0

0.000

almost 3 years ago

I think it would be great with Lily for battles with no or little magic

1

1

0.000

almost 3 years ago

I like the idea of non-linear crown distribution, especially the version suggested by @kalkulus. And tbh I think changing that one aspect co

2

2

0.000

about 3 years ago

I know at least 2 methods (as a human player) that can indentify battle helper usage with high enough probability for most cases. Not sure

0

1

0.000

about 3 years ago

There is a reason why chess engines are not allowed in competitions. Competition is not about cheating. What would be the point if everyone

3

1

0.000

about 3 years ago

1

1

0.000

over 3 years ago

I just get battles from Splinterlands battle API, but only from top 100 players each league. With tables only the post would be too long (t

0

0

0.000

over 3 years ago

I can see pros and cons of both, I would rather have anti-bot measures in Wild but at this point I am okay with both.

2

1

0.000