Comments by fortune1m - Honouree

fortune1m

1 day ago

@fortune1m "this post is so stupid. there is no yield, the dis..." this post is so stupid. there is no yield, the distributed amount was our own capital invested back and when they couldn't shill us anything

2

1

0.000

1 day ago

@fortune1m "how long more do we have to wait for @leostrategy ..." how long more do we have to wait for @leostrategy to tell us what is happening with our assets? it's totally unacceptable and ridiculous at

4

1

0.007

12 days ago

@fortune1m "Still nothing from @leostrategy. I want an HONEST..." Still nothing from @leostrategy. I want an HONEST explanation of what you are doing or please wind up and distribute your LEO and other to

1

1

0.000

29 days ago

@fortune1m "Given the previous fraudulent promises my strong p..." Given the previous fraudulent promises my strong preference is for you to wind up operations and distribute your Leo to the debt tokens hold

5

1

0.085

about 1 month ago

It's better than ai slop of prior posts but it is a laughably bad follow up to what most people would call fraud - continuous false offering

3

1

0.136

about 1 month ago

@fortune1m "Are you adding more fiat or what are you divesting..." Are you adding more fiat or what are you divesting from to buy LEO? why are you long so much LEO, I have 40k ish

1

1

0.000

about 1 month ago

@fortune1m "if you make profit in ACE and it is illiquid and n..." if you make profit in ACE and it is illiquid and not worth much it's not worth the effort either long or short.

0

1

0.000

about 1 month ago

Yeah and I guess if the $ Leo price recovers and /or revenue increases in $ terms then the collateral behind the debt could improve in the f

1

1

0.000

about 1 month ago

I don't think they have enough assets or revenue to pay the yield sustainably right now. For SURGE they owe 500,000 usd 15% = 75k per year a

1

1

0.000

about 1 month ago

leostrategy are trying to build or pivot to some project or projects that expect to generate revenue to allow a recovery

0

1

0.000

about 1 month ago

as far as I understand the yield on SURGE was not sustainable for leostrategy to continue to pay based on their assets/income, so they stopp

0

1

0.000

about 1 month ago

@fortune1m "Thanks for addressing it and giving your perspecti..." Thanks for addressing it and giving your perspective. Let's hope that any future post from them is sufficiently cautious and based on realit

1

0

0.000

about 1 month ago

SURGE holders today wouldn't get $1 in a liquidation today, liquidation would then wipe out the tokens issued after SURGE, so I can understa

0

1

0.000

about 1 month ago

If there wasn't a long term realistic plan then they would be morally obligated to do a liquidation (transfer of tokens to the debt holders)

0

1

0.000

about 1 month ago

SURGE holders are the most senior debt holders so they have to get all the assets of Leostrategy in the case of a liquidation where the out

0

1

0.000