RE: Hive dying and soon stalling?
You are viewing a single comment's thread:
YOU PRAISE EVERYTHING AND EVERYONE for the sake of two upvotes.
Where?
Let's hope the AUTHORITIES, sooner or later, arrive here too to CLEAN UP. I think EVERYONE would be happy, wouldn't you?
It is funny how she demonise one authority and simultaneously hope to be saved by the other authority (having a track record of hundreds of years being the biggest thief)
I can only speak for myself and am against authority in general, which is also the main Idea behind decentralisation and also anarchy.
But with that perspective all the "sides" attack me - as usual.
Have a great day
0
0
0.000
Hi, I've stated multiple times that it's a GENERALIZATION (I've put it in parentheses several times)—by now, I know well how things work on the web. Not knowing you and with this account of yours not having done anything to me to date, I couldn't say otherwise. But I can express MY FREE THOUGHT and EXPERIENCE.
Getting back to the fact that you're trying to turn it into a joke, I reconfirm and it's evident from this comment of yours too—external authorities are BIASED, so they would eventually analyze the facts, transactions (in case of tax authorities), etc. Depending on the authority that intervenes (REMEMBER, it's a HYPOTHESIS), and depending on JURISDICTIONS, and depending on other factors like "complaints" (single or multiple), sending evidence to specific bodies that monitor money flows (like anti-money laundering, etc.), different scenarios would open up. So don't throw everything into a joke! People aren't stupid, especially if you then RUN AWAY and don't respond to the merits of the questions! In fact, once again, you make "nice" posts but in substance, you NEVER respond.
Let's take the opportunity to say that multiaccounts and not only those that transfer money through various UNVERIFIED accounts, effectively creating GHOST transactions, should fall under the "characteristics" and attention of anti-money laundering. But I'm sure you know the basic principles well! If not, if you're one of the many who swap funds from account to account on your behalf, I'd pay more attention since even the most STUPID know that this practice is ILLEGAL in the majority of STATES.
If you'd like to contradict this too, this type of action also falls under the category of "DRESSING ABROAD" (esterovestizione)or "fake foreign tax residency. , in case the subject has NEVER DECLARED them in their country of origin—still HYPOTHESIZING absolute transparency, so in the best-case scenario.
These and other technical/legal questions would surely be of interest to the ENTIRE USER BASE, and I don't see any terms and conditions that bring up these aspects, let alone mention them or prohibit fraudulent use of multiaccounts.
It makes me smile how you try to justify and downplay those who expose FACTS. At least respond in a TECHNICAL/LEGAL way before delving into aspects that require a minimum of ATTENTION.
Best wishes and please, don't THROW EVERYTHING INTO A JOKE! @condividisulweb