RE: What Is Coercion? | July 19, 2026 | Sunday | Journal
You are viewing a single comment's thread:
LOL! "...or else!" is a short form for "or else I will cause this problem for You." That's why I said "With the "...or else!" being relatively clear to the One being coerced." It's a common threat line.
0
0
0.000
That's exactly the problem though. The "or else" is doing all the work, but the meaning is being assumed.
"Do this or else I won't eat."
"Do this or else I will hurt you."
Both contain an "or else," but they are obviously not the same thing.
Again, The question is not whether an "or else" exists. The question is what the "or else" actually is, who controls it, and whether it undermines someone's meaningful ability to refuse.
Let's not pick nits. "Do this or else I will [fill in blank with something the Other does not want to happen].
Satisfied yet?
Ah yes. "Let's not pick nits" on a philosophical journal entry attempting to define coercion.
Picking nits is literally the entire project. If I stop picking nits, the whole journal series becomes:
That'll save everyone from the inconvenience of thinking.
Investigation complete. Thanks everyone. See you all next week.
Also, ma'am, I am currently three journal entries deep into arguing with dictionaries, and your telling me not to be philosophical on a philosophical post. If you don't like that then you're in the wrong neighborhood.
No... LOL! I am speaking of the specific argument about "...or else!" This is a term that implies something the One spoken to does not want. And so, since You picked the nit of "gee, it could be, "I will not eat" (if You don't make food)" or whatever, I broke it down for You with the bracketed bit about being something the One being told to do something does not want to happen.
I am hardly telling You not "to be philosophical on a philosophical post." SMH!
I think we're actually closer in agreement than it appeared.
Yes, an "or else" implies an unwanted consequence. I don't disagree with that.
The point of my example was that the existence of an unwanted consequence alone doesn't define coercion. The missing question is what the consequence is, who controls it, why it is being imposed, and whether it undermines someone's meaningful ability to refuse.
"Do this or else..." identifies a structure. It doesn't yet tell us whether that structure is coercive.
For example:
"Pay me for the work I completed, or I won't continue working." The consequence may be unwanted, but that doesn't automatically make it coercion.
"Leave my property, or I will call the police." The consequence may also be unwanted, but it may simply be the enforcement of a boundary.
Compare that with:
"Do this or I will hurt you."
The structure is the same, but the nature of the consequence and the ability to refuse are completely different.
That's the nit I'm picking. The "or else" is where the question begins, not where it ends. 🙂
I got to get to work now.
Fair enough, I guess. I think the issue here is that I used a standard bullying term, and You are making issues over it, applying it to non-bullying statements. LOL!
But... Whatever.
I understand your point.